Grateful

     I'm grateful for all of our Media; today however, I owe THE NEW YORK TIMES a great 'Hoo-yaaah!'  It's because they posted a News item that some people really don't know; has been a Word of Mouth or Eyewitness item some 2k years ago.  It's makes people more than glad for the USA.
Noting all of the stupidity going on in here, no one wants to be that ass-backwards(nor will allow it from the few who might)!
       I had to gawk at this portion of an exerpt: 'Picture of Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani, the Iranian woman sentenced to death by stoning for adultery, she now faces 99 lashes for having her picture taken unveiled.
The first thing I squawked as I read that was 'Jesus Christ!'  His time was about the only time many ever read of that mindset, and Jesus didn't approve of it then.
Beside that the woman couldn't commit adultery alone, she was probably too mentally jacked-up to judge whats right or wrong after a long period of time; having been brought up to believe that when a man speaks, he's to be obeyed; not disputed. That woman was out of her only mind, developing another one!
      Who wouldn't lose-it for having to exist as in an urn?  And: Where was the man she committed adultery with?  Don't her accusers know that Allah is Just?
If the Iranians would please Him, they'd hurry to judge both GUILTY, together.
Who turned her in? Smiegeil can tell you; with one boney, pointing finger he'd hiss "He did! Heee diddd!"  I agree; her lover ran off in guilt to turn her in so he could feel free of sin.
Iran should take heed to Peaceful Others when it comes to promoting this guy to a Military position calling for manning misiles. He will turn the damned thing from the targeted site to Home, then; press every button that reads: Danger! Donot press! 
His excuse to the Persians still alive would be "I, I saw one of their soldiers running towards us; so, I tried to shoot him. He's dead!"  Can the Military trust a man who'd leave his lover(even a prostitute)to the fate of 99 lashes? Or, even sudden execution?  He knows that a married woman is danger to press.
The country should go after his keesters, else it'd appear as if 2000 years of no heartfelt change leads to nothing but to marry for production of engineers and soldiers.  Whatelse does women seem to matter beside to jerk around? It's crazy.
Seeing that the beauty is mentally amiss; could her husband not deliver her for the less scandalous shame; less violent shame, of divorce?
This mess gives no glory to manhood.